Buddy Testing: A Developer’s Secret Weapon for Better Code

In the world of software development, speed and quality often pull in opposite directions. But what if there was a way to write code faster and catch bugs earlier—without needing to wait for QA? Enter Buddy Testing, an often underrated but powerful practice that adds a layer of informal, collaborative review before your code ever reaches the test environment.

What Is Buddy Testing?

Buddy testing is a peer-driven testing approach where two team members—usually developers, or a developer and a QA engineer—work together to test a feature before it is formally reviewed or deployed. Think of it as a lightweight combination of pair programming and code review, but with a strong focus on functional testing and early feedback.

Rather than writing code in isolation and tossing it over the wall to QA, you bring in a colleague—your buddy—to look at it from a fresh perspective. They run through the feature, try to break it, ask questions, and suggest improvements. And because it’s peer-to-peer, the feedback loop is fast, informal, and highly effective.

Why It Works

The key to buddy testing is contextual understanding. Your buddy may not have built the feature, but they understand the codebase, the business logic, and the architecture. This makes their feedback more informed than what you’d get from a black-box QA pass—and they’re often better at spotting logic errors, edge cases, and missed scenarios.

Here are some core benefits:

• Early Bug Detection: Catch issues before they make it to QA or production.
• Shared Knowledge: Developers learn each other’s modules and design patterns.
• Better Team Collaboration: It fosters a culture of openness, learning, and shared responsibility.
• Faster Feedback Loop: No tickets, no waiting. Just honest, fast feedback.
• Smoother CI/CD Flow: Reduces blockers in QA and improves pipeline stability.

How It Actually Looks in Practice

Let’s say Developer A just finished implementing a complex form submission feature. Before merging the branch, they ping Developer B to be their buddy.

Developer B pulls the branch, runs the feature, and checks:

• Does the form handle validation errors properly?
• What happens when the API call fails?
• Are edge cases like empty fields or long inputs handled?
• Is the UI consistent with design guidelines?
• Can anything be simplified or made more readable in the code?

This session can last anywhere from 15 minutes to an hour—but in that time, they often catch 3–5 issues that might’ve otherwise reached QA or users.

When Should You Use Buddy Testing?

You don’t need to do it for everything, but it works best for:

• Critical features or high-risk changes
• New flows that span multiple components
• Anything that will impact other teams
• Areas where QA coverage is limited

For trivial bug fixes or changes with strong test coverage, buddy testing may not be necessary. But for features where user impact is high, this layer of peer testing can be invaluable.

Tips for Effective Buddy Testing

• Choose the right buddy: Someone familiar with the area but not directly involved in the implementation.
• Explain what you're testing: A quick walkthrough helps your buddy focus their review.
• Be open to feedback: It's not about proving your code is perfect—it's about making it better.
• Use a checklist: A simple checklist for UI, logic, edge cases, and performance can guide the session.
• Keep it short: This is not a code review marathon. 30 minutes is often enough.

How It Complements Other Practices

Buddy testing doesn’t replace automated tests, code reviews, or QA—it complements them. Think of it as a buffer zone between development and formal testing.

In fact, buddy testing can make code reviews more productive because many functional issues are already sorted out. Reviewers can then focus on architecture, patterns, and long-term maintainability instead of obvious bugs or UI oddities.

Real-World Considerations

Don’t make it a bottleneck. If your team is too rigid about requiring buddy tests before every commit, it can slow down velocity. Use it strategically.

Avoid pairing with the same person all the time. Rotating buddies ensures broader knowledge transfer and avoids siloed understanding.

Track results informally. If you notice that buddy testing consistently catches certain types of bugs, consider formalizing those cases into unit or integration tests.

The Human Element

Beyond the technical gains, buddy testing makes teams stronger. It builds trust. It encourages conversations around code quality, user experience, and edge case handling—before the user ever touches the product.

It also provides a safety net for juniors or new team members who may not yet feel confident in their changes. Knowing someone has their back helps them write better code—and learn faster.

Finally

In a development world that prizes speed, automation, and CI/CD, it’s tempting to rely solely on machines and pipelines to catch issues. But no amount of automation can replace human insight—and that’s what buddy testing brings to the table.

It’s not about bureaucracy. It’s about working together to make the code—and the team—better.

So next time you finish a feature, don’t just push and pray. Ping a buddy.

It might just save your sprint.

Support Us