Mastering Array Merging in JavaScript: Spread vs. concat()

When working with arrays in JavaScript, merging two or more arrays is a frequent task. Whether you’re combining lists of items or simply organizing your data, you’ll often come across two main ways to merge arrays: using the spread operator (...) and the concat() method. These are both effective, but they come with different behaviors and performance implications.

In this article, we’ll break down both approaches and highlight the advantages and trade-offs so you can choose the best method for your needs.

What is the Spread Operator (...) in JavaScript?

The spread operator is a shorthand syntax that allows you to expand elements from one array into another. It's often used to combine arrays, copy elements, or even spread object properties.

Here’s a simple example of merging two arrays using the spread operator:

const arr1 = [1, 2, 3];
const arr2 = [4, 5, 6];

const merged = [...arr1, ...arr2];
console.log(merged);  // [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Notice how the spread operator ... "unpacks" the elements of arr1 and arr2 into the new array. This method is clean, intuitive, and particularly useful when you need to handle multiple arrays.

What is concat() in JavaScript?

The concat() method is another way to merge arrays. Unlike the spread operator, which is more concise and modern, concat() is an older, built-in method. It joins two or more arrays into a new array.

Here’s an example using concat():

const arr1 = [1, 2, 3];
const arr2 = [4, 5, 6];

const merged = arr1.concat(arr2);
console.log(merged);  // [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

concat() returns a new array by merging the arrays provided as arguments. It’s important to remember that concat() doesn’t modify the original arrays — it creates a new array with the combined elements.

Comparing Performance: Spread vs. concat()

You might have heard that the spread operator is faster than concat(). While the difference in performance may be small for smaller arrays, it can be noticeable when working with larger datasets.

• Spread Operator (...): The spread operator tends to perform better, especially when combining arrays with larger numbers of elements. This is because the spread operator is implemented in a more optimized manner in modern JavaScript engines.
• concat(): The concat() method can sometimes incur more overhead due to its function call structure and internal processes. This can make it slower than the spread operator, particularly when merging multiple arrays or large datasets.

That said, for most use cases, you won’t notice significant differences in performance, unless you’re dealing with thousands or millions of elements.

Other Considerations

While performance is a key consideration, there are other factors that might influence your choice between the spread operator and concat(). Let’s go through some of them.

1. Readability and Conciseness

• Spread Operator: The spread operator is more concise and often easier to understand at a glance. If you’re merging arrays inline or passing them as arguments to a function, the spread syntax is neat and straightforward.

const merged = [...arr1, ...arr2, ...arr3];

• concat(): While concat() is still clear, especially if you're merging arrays step by step, it requires a little more typing and might feel less natural compared to the modern spread operator.

const merged = arr1.concat(arr2, arr3);

2. Chaining Methods

A notable advantage of concat() is that it can be chained with other array methods. For instance, you could chain a map(), filter(), or reduce() method directly after concatenating arrays.

const merged = arr1.concat(arr2).map(x => x * 2);

While the spread operator doesn’t offer direct chaining, you can still combine it with other methods by wrapping it in parentheses.

3. Mutability

Both the spread operator and concat() return a new array, meaning neither modifies the original arrays. If you are looking to preserve the immutability of the original arrays, both methods are great options. However, it’s always good to ensure that you don’t accidentally mutate an array elsewhere in your code.

4. Compatibility with Older Environments

While the spread operator is widely supported in modern JavaScript environments (ES6+), there are still cases where older browsers or environments may not support it. If you're targeting older JavaScript versions, you might want to stick with concat() to ensure compatibility. Tools like Babel can transpile the spread operator, but that adds extra complexity to your build process.

5. Merging More Than Two Arrays

Both methods handle the merging of more than two arrays well. However, concat() can sometimes be seen as a better choice when merging many arrays, as it can accept multiple arguments in a single call.

const merged = arr1.concat(arr2, arr3, arr4, arr5);

With the spread operator, you need to use it multiple times or wrap it in an array:

const merged = [...arr1, ...arr2, ...arr3, ...arr4, ...arr5];

While the spread syntax is still readable, concat() may be a bit cleaner when dealing with numerous arrays.

Finally

Both the spread operator and concat() method have their places in JavaScript. Here's a quick summary:

• Use the spread operator if you prefer a modern, concise syntax and are working with ES6+ environments.
• Use concat() if you need compatibility with older environments, prefer method chaining, or are working with multiple arrays in a single call.

Ultimately, for most scenarios, performance differences between the two methods are minimal. The choice largely depends on your coding style and the environment you're working in. Whether you’re using the spread operator for cleaner code or concat() for more method chaining, both provide reliable and efficient ways to merge arrays in JavaScript.

Support Us