The “Belt and Braces” Approach in Software: Why Redundancy Is a Smart Developer’s Friend

In software development, there’s a saying borrowed from the world of clothing: the “belt and braces” (or “belt and suspenders” in the US). It’s the idea of using redundant layers of protection to make absolutely sure something doesn't fail.

Sounds excessive? Maybe.
But in practice? It’s often the reason your app didn’t crash, your data didn’t disappear, or your team didn’t spend Saturday night firefighting.

Let’s walk through how this principle applies to different layers of modern software engineering—from code to infrastructure, and even manual QA.

1. In Programming: Guard Rails on Guard Rails

Let’s start with the basics.

Take a form input.

A junior developer might just add a JavaScript validation rule that says, “this field is required.”
A more experienced one will add the same validation on the backend—because they know that JavaScript can be bypassed or fail silently.

Why?
Because if you trust only the client, you’ve built a bridge without checking if both ends meet.

Other examples of belt and braces in code:

• Validating data types in the code and the database schema (e.g., using a CHECK constraint and type checking in the app).
• Using try/catch blocks and validating inputs before executing critical operations.
• Saving data to a database and backing it up via write-ahead logs, file-based archives, or Kafka topics.

2. In System Design: Redundancy Means Resilience

System architects love this approach—and for good reason.

When you’re dealing with critical infrastructure, a single point of failure is not just a possibility; it’s a time bomb.

Here’s how belt and braces shows up in infrastructure:

• Load balancers + Auto-healing groups: If one instance fails, traffic is rerouted and a replacement spins up.
• Database replicas + backups: Even if a replica fails, you still have a backup from 30 minutes ago.
• Multi-region deployments + DNS failover: If a whole region goes down (yes, it happens), users are seamlessly routed elsewhere.

Even error logging follows this mindset:

• Log to disk? Fine. But also ship logs to a centralized service like ELK or Datadog.
• One alerting channel? Dangerous. Set up backup alerts via Slack and email and PagerDuty.

3. In Manual QA: Redundancy Helps Catch the Edge Cases

Quality assurance is more than “just testing.” It’s about catching what no one else thought about.

A solid QA team uses the belt and braces mindset:

• Scripted tests ensure that expected flows are covered.
• Exploratory testing catches the unexpected.
• Testers often record screen sessions and write detailed bug reports—so even if one detail is missed, the other fills the gap.

Good QA teams also retest critical flows before and after deployment, even if they passed CI.
Why? Because sometimes, things break in prod that don't show in staging. CDNs, caching, browser versions—you name it.

4. Bonus Layer: Documentation and Human Handoffs

Sometimes redundancy isn’t technical—it’s process-oriented.

• You write a script? Document how to use it.
• You do a critical deployment? Tag someone else to review.
• You have a failover plan? Test it quarterly.
  (Yes, it's annoying. But so is not knowing what to do during a real outage.)

This kind of discipline might feel excessive… until something goes wrong.

5. Considerations: When Is It Too Much?

The belt and braces approach should not be mistaken for overengineering.
The goal isn’t to build three backup systems for every minor function—it’s to apply redundancy where failure would be costly.

Ask:

• What would break if this failed?
• What’s the cost of that failure—data loss, downtime, user frustration?
• How easy is it to add a secondary safety net?

If the answers suggest high risk + low effort, it’s a perfect place to double up.

Finally

The “belt and braces” mindset isn’t about paranoia.
It’s about resilience, professionalism, and the maturity to accept that things will fail—so you design with that in mind.

In a world where users expect 99.99% uptime, where every bug can be a tweet, and where data loss can end careers, redundancy isn’t optional. It’s smart.

Support Us