The Myth of Stability in Semantic Versioning — And Why Pinning Versions Still Matters

When it comes to managing dependencies in software development, Semantic Versioning (SemVer) has become the industry standard. The promise is simple: with the right versioning convention, you can trust third-party packages not to break your application unexpectedly.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth:

Stability in SemVer is more myth than reality. And relying solely on SemVer to protect your app from breaking changes is wishful thinking.

Let’s unpack this—and explore what you should be doing instead.

🚧 Why SemVer Doesn’t Guarantee Stability

In theory, SemVer is a clean system:

• MAJOR (x.0.0): Breaking changes
• MINOR (1.x.0): New features, backward-compatible
• PATCH (1.0.x): Bug fixes, backward-compatible

However, in practice, maintainers:

• Accidentally introduce breaking changes in minor or patch versions
• Use version 0.x.x indefinitely (which per SemVer is treated as "unstable"—anything can change at any time)
• Do not strictly follow SemVer because of project complexity, lack of tests, or other constraints

If you’ve ever experienced an update that suddenly broke your build or caused subtle bugs, then you already know:

The number doesn’t always reflect the truth.

📌 Why You Should Prefer Static Versioning

Instead of relying on ^, ~, or version ranges like >=1.2.3 <2.0.0, you can lock dependencies to exact versions like:

"example-package": "1.2.3"

This ensures:

• Predictable builds — no surprises from upstream changes
• Better reproducibility — your dev, staging, and prod environments behave the same
• No accidental upgrades — protects your system from unexpected changes due to auto-updated dependencies

This is especially critical in:

• Systems with high uptime requirements
• Environments with strict validation, like fintech or healthcare
• Projects with limited test coverage, where unverified upgrades are risky

🧪 But Wait — What About Security and Bug Fixes?

That’s the catch.

If you pin versions too strictly:

• You miss out on important patch fixes (security updates, bug resolutions)
• You can end up with a bloated dependency tree, where multiple versions of the same library are included because sub-dependencies are pinned to slightly different versions

This is why most package managers offer a lock file:

• package-lock.json (npm)
• yarn.lock (Yarn)
• composer.lock (PHP)
• go.sum (Go modules)
• Cargo.lock (Rust)

These lock files allow you to:

• Use SemVer ranges for flexibility during development
• Automatically lock to exact versions once installed
• Ensure repeatable builds across environments

Best practice:

Allow flexible version specs (^1.2.3) in your package.json, but commit the lock file to version control for stability.

🔄 Upgrading With Confidence

Instead of upgrading blindly:

• Use dedicated upgrade tools like npm-check-updates, Renovate, or Dependabot
• Run all upgrades through your CI/CD pipeline
• Use automated regression tests to catch breaking changes
• Consider running canary or staging environments for real-world test runs before full rollout

Version hygiene is an ongoing process, not a one-time setup.

🧠 Other Considerations You Might Miss

1. Transitive Dependencies Can Still Break You

Even if you pin top-level dependencies, indirect (transitive) dependencies can still auto-update and break things—unless:

• You use lock files
• Or use tools like npm’s --package-lock-only or Docker build caching to freeze the full tree

2. Scoped Internal Packages

If you use internal packages across your monorepo or microservices, treat them like external dependencies. Use:

• Strict SemVer policies
• CI validations before pushing version changes

3. Immutable Artifact Builds

For truly stable builds:

• Build artifacts once (with all dependencies locked)
• Store the build outputs (e.g., Docker images, .tar.gz packages)
• Deploy from these, not from source+install every time

✅ Finally: Be Skeptical, Be Deliberate

Semantic Versioning is a useful guideline—but not a contract. Blind trust in SemVer can cost you hours of debugging and production issues.

The safest approach is to pin your dependency versions via lock files and treat upgrades as deliberate events—not something automatic.

Take control of your stack. Let versioning work for you, not against you.

Support Us