The Myth of the “Prompt Engineer”: Why Real Builders Share Their Prompts Freely
In the fast-moving world of AI development, there's a quiet misunderstanding spreading among some practitioners: that the value of a prompt engineer lies in their collection of “secret, high-performing prompts.”
Let’s be clear: real engineers don’t hoard prompts. They share, they iterate, and they understand that prompting is not a product—it's a disposable tool.
Prompts Have a Short Shelf Life
What worked amazingly well last week might break next month. Why?
- LLMs are evolving fast. Every few weeks, new models launch, existing ones get updates, and the behavior of your favorite model can shift without notice.
- Prompts are tightly coupled to model behavior. A prompt fine-tuned for GPT-4 might behave erratically on Claude, and even GPT-4’s own behavior can change subtly over time.
- Alignment priorities change. A lab might decide to make a model safer, more concise, or more factual—each decision alters how it interprets the same prompt.
We’ve seen it ourselves. When our team upgraded from Gemini 1.5 to 2.0, it took more than a week to realign all our prompts so that our workflows behaved like they used to. That’s not poor engineering. That’s the nature of prompt-based development.
Your Value Isn’t in the Prompt
If you think your value is tied to a specific prompt you wrote, that’s a red flag—not of competence, but of insecurity.
Because here’s the truth: writing a good prompt is easy. What’s hard is:
- Understanding the underlying problem deeply.
- Knowing which model to use (or not use at all).
- Realizing when a prompt is the wrong tool, and shifting to code, retrieval, APIs, or rules-based logic instead.
- Navigating fallback strategies when LLM output becomes unpredictable.
Prompting is a tool. Not a role. Not a job. Not a moat.
Engineers worth their salt are not defined by the syntax of a prompt—they’re defined by their ability to build solutions that work.
Prompting Is Not Sacred
Because prompting is just one tool in the problem-solving toolbox, we should treat it like any other disposable piece of logic:
- You write it,
- You test it,
- You throw it away when it stops working.
Think of it like CSS: nobody protects their CSS like intellectual property, because the value is in the outcome, not the rule you wrote.
Why You Should Share Your Prompts
If your prompts work well right now—share them.
- They’ll likely break soon anyway.
- You might get feedback that makes them better.
- Someone else might iterate on top and spark new insights you hadn’t considered.
- And most importantly, it shows you’re confident in your ability to solve, not just instruct.
In fact, sharing is the best way to get better. Communities thrive on openness. The most respected builders aren't the ones who hide—they're the ones who teach.
Finally
If you still think “prompt engineer” is a job title worth protecting, you might be focusing on the wrong game. The future doesn’t belong to prompt whisperers—it belongs to problem solvers who can use any tool, including prompts, to get the job done.
So stop hiding your prompts. They’re not treasure. They’re just tools.
And tools are meant to be shared.
Comments ()