Understanding the ISC License in npm Projects: A Developer’s Guide

When initializing a new Node.js project using npm init -y, one of the often-overlooked configurations is the default license, which is set to ISC. For new developers, this may raise questions about why npm chooses ISC instead of other well-known licenses, such as MIT. This article unpacks what the ISC license entails, why npm defaults to it, and explores some additional considerations for open-source licenses in general.

What is the ISC License?

The ISC License (Internet Systems Consortium License) is a permissive open-source license that offers freedoms similar to the MIT License but with even simpler terms. Here’s a breakdown:

• Permissive Nature: Like MIT, the ISC License allows anyone to use, copy, modify, and distribute the software, including for commercial purposes, as long as they follow basic terms.
• Concise and Clear Language: The ISC License is very brief, consisting of just a few lines. This makes it easy to understand at a glance while preserving all the core permissions of permissive licenses.
• No Warranty: It includes a disclaimer of liability, stating that the software comes "as-is" without warranty, meaning that the creators aren’t liable for any issues or damages caused by the software.

Why npm Uses the ISC License by Default

When you run npm init -y, npm automatically sets up the ISC License as the default. Here’s why ISC is npm’s default choice:

1. Simplicity: The ISC License is simpler than the MIT License, making it more accessible to developers. It omits some extra clauses found in MIT, such as the “no endorsement clause,” without fundamentally altering the freedoms it provides.
2. Compatibility and Openness: Both ISC and MIT are widely compatible with other licenses, but ISC’s slightly lighter language makes it a great fit for npm’s goals to support open-source flexibility.
3. Open-Source Tradition: ISC has deep roots in the open-source community. Originally created by the Internet Systems Consortium, it has been widely used since the 1980s, lending npm’s default choice an extra layer of community-backed trust.

How ISC Compares to MIT

The MIT License is also permissive and allows the same freedoms as ISC, but with some additional wording and clauses. The main differences include:

• MIT’s “no endorsement” clause: MIT includes a line saying the authorship cannot be used to promote derived software, while ISC omits this line, making ISC even simpler.
• Slightly Longer Text: MIT has a few additional lines, which make it slightly longer. ISC is often preferred by developers who want a more minimal license without losing core permissive properties.

Additional Points to Consider

When it comes to licensing, it’s worth taking a moment to evaluate what license best fits your project goals. Here are some considerations that go beyond ISC and MIT:

1. License Type Based on Project Goals: If your goal is wide adoption, permissive licenses like ISC, MIT, and Apache 2.0 are ideal. But if you wish to keep some control over derived works, consider copyleft licenses like GPL.
2. Legal Compatibility with Dependencies: If your project relies on libraries with different licenses, verify that your project’s license is compatible with these dependencies. This is usually simple with permissive licenses but can become complex with restrictive ones.
3. Documentation and Attribution Requirements: Even permissive licenses like MIT and ISC require attribution. Make sure you include the original copyright notice and license text in your distribution if required by the license.
4. Future Use Cases and Commercial Applications: Some licenses may impact potential commercial applications or contributions from others. For example, copyleft licenses (GPL) require derivative works to be open-sourced under the same terms, while ISC and MIT do not.

How to Change the License in npm

If ISC isn’t the right fit for your project, npm makes it easy to change. Open the package.json file, and update the "license": "ISC" field to "license": "MIT" or any other license name, like "Apache-2.0" for the Apache license. Be sure to add a copy of the new license text if the license you choose requires it.

Finally

In short, the ISC License is a practical, permissive license that makes sense as a default for many open-source JavaScript projects. Its simplicity, history, and alignment with open-source practices make it a great fit for npm’s goals. However, before you launch a project, it’s worthwhile to evaluate your licensing needs and make any adjustments in package.json if a different license aligns better with your vision.

Understanding open-source licenses is important to ensure your code is used as intended and that you’re meeting your obligations as an author. By carefully considering your choice, you help ensure your project’s longevity and compatibility within the open-source community.

Support Us